The differences between the first and the second journal review

Hello everyone!! Welcome back to my blog. It's been along time I didn't write the article in this blog. Now I want to make a differences between the journal that I've reviewed before and the journal that I've already read.

The tittle of the new journal is "How Phase theory can be used to improve reading comprehension in children". And then, let's go to distinguish these journals.  There are two differences between the first journal and the second journal, that will be discuss bellow. Check it out!!

First, I would like to explain the differences in the structure. In the first journal there are Abstract, Subject Areas, introduction, literature review, Method, finding and discussion, and conclusion. But, in the second journal there are just Abstract, Subject Areas, Introduction, Literature review, and Implications.

Second, the differences in the contents. In the first journal, the contents are disscus about analysis of author to some students about their reading comprehension skill with KWL strategies. In the second journal, the contents are about the Phase theory which is can improve the students' reading comprehension. The differences is in the first journal the author want to check the reading comprehension of students and the second journal, the author want to applied the phase theory to make students' reading comprehension increase.

Thus, the differences between the first and the second journal that I've read. Next I will make the review of the second journal, so stay tune in this blog. See yaa!!!